Loewen ch 11
Until reaching this chapter of the book, I never thought
about how textbooks are concluded. Come to think of it, my teachers always said
there was simply no time to cover everything, therefore, I’ve never actually
opened the ending of a textbook.
When I think about it, I studied history all throughout
Junior High and High School, and I do not recall learning about the recent
past, such as the Vietnam War and the fall of the Soviet Union. Maybe I was a
bad student and just don’t remember the classes, but I feel that the teachers
might be following the textbook chronologically in order to avoid teaching the
awkward facts. My guess is that the teachers do not want to teach us student’s
lie, therefore they are reluctant to go through the ending chapters of the
textbooks.
Strictly speaking, there is a certain timeline that the
teachers need to follow so that the students can understand the flow of the
events. By teaching history randomly, the details would be disconnected,
further making the students dislike the subject. There is a need to follow the
chronological order of the facts, however if the teachers are aware of the fact
that they will not finish the textbook, I do not understand why they cannot
plan the course so that the students actually reach the end of the text.
The textbooks featured in this book, all seem to conclude on
a high note. The vague and optimistic conclusions are of no help for the
students who are going to lead the next generation. The lack of a realistic
afterword can be perceived as one of the reasons as to why students find
history irrelevant. The authors do not need to be cynical and critical about
every detail, but they should not do away with phrases like “all we need to do
is keep our chin up”
0 件のコメント:
コメントを投稿